|
|
|
1
|
This fallacy occurs when a writer builds an argument upon the assumption that there are only two choices or possible outcomes when actually there are several
|
|
2
|
presenting only the information that is positive to an idea or proposal and omitting information that is contrary to the idea.
|
|
3
|
Makes people feel as if their safety, security, or health is in danger
|
|
4
|
reasoning that suggests that because everyone else believes something or is doing something, then it must be valid or correct
|
|
5
|
a fallacy of logic in which the widespread occurrence of something is assumed to make it right or true
|
|
6
|
does not allow for discussion because the speaker presumes that his or her beliefs are beyond question
|
|
7
|
A fallacy in which a speaker or writer seeks to persuade not by giving evidence but by appealing to the respect people have for a famous person or institution
|
|
9
|
Persuading by making people feel as though they are one of the elite if they are using a particular product or thinking a certain way
|
|
11
|
Instead of attacking your opponents argument, chose a vaguely related , weaker argument and crush that instead
|
|
16
|
certain ideas that may involve misleading messages designed to manipulate people
|
|
17
|
the mistaken substitution of one word for another word that sounds similar
|
|
19
|
stating a conclusion that doesn't follow from the first premise(s)
|
|
21
|
fallacy of logic occurs when writer assumes that an incident that precedes another is the cause of the second incident
|
|
22
|
speaker relies on irrelevant information for his/her argument. premises of the argument are irrelevant to the conclusion.
|
|
|
